American Journal of Human Biology, 21(2), 188–191. Comparing different methods of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurement. Second-to-fourth digit length, testosterone and spatial ability. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: new data and a meta-analytic review. Honekopp, J., Bartholdt, L., Beier, L., & Liebert, A. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Harrison (Eds.), Research in experimental economics, 12 (pp. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1253–1262. Second and fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 1–17.įink, B., Neave, N., Laughton, K., & Manning, J. Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study of actual and forecast risk attitudes of women and men. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes towards financial risks. Mimeo, Stockholm School of Economics.Įckel, C., & Grossman, P. Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive abilities? IZA Discussion Paper 2735.ĭreber, A., & Hoffman, M. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8574.ĭohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. Gender, occupation choice and the risk of death at work. AutoMetric software for measurement of 2D:4D ratios, from accessed June 24, 2008.ĭeLeire, T., & Levy, H. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35(3), 265–283.ĭeBruine, L. Biological Psychology, 62, 147–156.ĭaruvala, D. Sex role identity related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Ĭsatho, A., Osvath, A., Bicsak, E., Karadi, K., Manning, J. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(2), 623–628.Ĭroson, R., & Gneezy, U. Second-to-fourth-digit ratio predicts success among high frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(16), 6167–6172.Ĭoates, J. Endogenous steroids and financial risk-taking on a London trading floor. Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? Working paper.Ĭoates, J. Why can’t a woman bid like a man? Working paper.Ĭleave, B., Nikiforakis, N., & Slonim, R. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 809–842.Ĭhen, Y., Katsucak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk-taking. T., Johnnesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(10), 3721–3726.Ĭesarini, D., Dawes, C. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. Gender difference in risk-taking: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2327–2330.īyrnes, J. High-testosterone men reject low Ultimatum Game offers. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31(3), 301–325.īurnham, T. Attitudes toward risk: theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 395–407.īinswanger, H. Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 167–193.īinswanger, H. Risk aversion and physical prowess: prediction, choice and bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1115.īall, S., Eckel, C., & Heracleous, M. A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: a reanalysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 384–390.Īrnold, A. Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Thus, the 2D:4D ratio partially explains variation in financial risk-taking behavior within and between sexes and offers evidence of a biological basis for risk-taking behavior.Īpicella, C. Moreover, for men and women at the extremes of the digit-ratio distribution the difference in risk-taking disappears. We further find that the ratio partially explains the variation in risk-taking between the sexes. In financially motivated decision-making tasks, we find that men and women with smaller 2D:4D ratios chose significantly riskier options. A smaller 2D:4D ratio has been linked to higher exposure to prenatal testosterone relative to estradiol, with men having lower ratios than women. We explore a potential biological basis of risk-taking variation within and between the sexes by studying how the ratio between the length of the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D) predicts risk-taking. Many important decisions involve financial risk, and substantial evidence suggests that women tend to be more risk averse than men.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |